Comments on: Type-hackery for the practical programmer http://fmapfixreturn.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/type-hackery-for-the-practical-programmer/ intercalate " " . ("Haskell" :) . (:[]) $ "Blog" Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:50:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: sclv http://fmapfixreturn.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/type-hackery-for-the-practical-programmer/#comment-95 Sun, 25 May 2008 15:11:32 +0000 http://fmapfixreturn.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-95 I should note that Saizan on #haskell kindly pointed out that all this Sat nonsense is just extra work and MapFromTupleD can be turned into a class directly, making life significantly easier (and probably more efficient too!).

]]> By: Daniel Patterson http://fmapfixreturn.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/type-hackery-for-the-practical-programmer/#comment-50 Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:22:35 +0000 http://fmapfixreturn.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-50 This is very promising!

]]> By: sclv http://fmapfixreturn.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/type-hackery-for-the-practical-programmer/#comment-49 Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:36:48 +0000 http://fmapfixreturn.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-49 Zounds! thanks for the catch. fixed now. I think I caused that by wrangling with the same mangling in the first place.

]]> By: Adam Langley http://fmapfixreturn.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/type-hackery-for-the-practical-programmer/#comment-46 Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:39:20 +0000 http://fmapfixreturn.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-46 Wow, the comment system really managed that last one! Let’s try again:

> *Main> mapFromTuple (1,2) :: [Dynamic]
> [<<Integer>>, <<[Char]>>]

That’s [<<Integer>>, <<Integer>>], surely?

]]> By: Adam Langley http://fmapfixreturn.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/type-hackery-for-the-practical-programmer/#comment-45 Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:37:37 +0000 http://fmapfixreturn.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-45 > *Main> mapFromTuple (1,2) :: [Dynamic]
> [<>,<>]

That’s [<>, <>], surely?

AGL

]]>